FA Cup Final Focus: Manchester City

14.05.11

Can Tevez be for City what Ferguson is for Everton?

Even before I tuned into watch Everton play Man City last week, I knew Everton would win. I’d known since it had been revealed that Duncan Ferguson would be making his return to Goodison Park before the game. The big man is a true Everton legend, an icon who represents the commitment and passion that epitomises the club. In dark times, Duncan was our hero, he helped keep our heads above the water.

And Man City, in their current guise, don’t have that. It’s the reason why Everton have got such a hoodoo over them in recent seasons (we’ve beaten them in seven of our last eight meetings) and why City’s undeniable wealth of talent has not yet been transformed into the sort of genuine success, you know: the glittery silvery kind, that all their lavish spending surely demands. Is today the day that changes?

Click through to find out…


FA Cup Final Focus: Stoke City

14.05.11

Pulis has transformed Stoke this season, can he finish it in style?

I wrote a guest blog, back in early November, where I suggested that Stoke were coming a little bit unstuck because Tony Pulis was attempting to take them away from their tried, trusted and maligned formula of direct football. Looking back now, it’s easy to think I was talking nonsense – Stoke are preparing to compete in the FA Cup Final today, and they sit a very comfortable 8th in the Premier League.

But back when I wrote that, Stoke had made a pretty average start to the season and you could really see them struggling to retain the Premier League status they had fought to retain, almost literally, for two seasons before this campaign. Pulis spent some decent money in the summer, bringing in some talented players who somewhat broke the mould of what we’d come to expect from Stoke City previously.

Click through for the full article…


Who will win the Premier League? (Part 1)

10.08.10

Who will emulate Chelsea's success from last season?

Less than a week to go until the Premier League gets under way for the 2010/11 season, and things are shaping up nicely. Starting at the bottom, Newcastle and WBA are familiar faces back for another crack at the Premiership while last season’s bottom half strugglers will hope Blackpool are the minnows they appear to be. At the other end of the table, the ‘big four’ seems to be disbanding – do we now have a big eight or a top two/three with six/five teams close behind? Only time will tell.

The big question at the start of every season though, is who will be champions come May next year? It’s a very difficult question to answer – as proved last season when many “top” pundits couldn’t look past Liverpool who had a woeful season. I myself – without sounding too smug – got it spot on last year, predicting Chelsea would finish top of the pile in my Season Preview. Can I repeat the trick this time around?

Read on and find out my prediction…


Carlos “Bosman” Tevez: Is he a free agent?

14.05.09

Another Tevez saga beckons, and the man himself could throw the toys out of Uniteds pram.

Another Tevez saga beckons, and the man himself could throw the toys out of United's pram.

That’s right loyal readers, another transfer window is trundling ever closer towards us and so, naturally, a new saga surrounding the future of Carlos Tevez is blowing up. The Argentinian remains in good form and a crowd favourite at Old Trafford, but Alex Ferguson remains resistant to the idea of paying thirty-two million pounds to secure his services full time, perhaps justified given that he is often selected amongst the substitutes.

However, whichever way you feel about the relative merits of Tevez and Berbatov, you have to admire United’s nerve, if some newspaper reports are on the money. Those respected journalists over at The Sun reckon that United are cooking up a plot to sign Tevez on a free transfer, in an attempt to use the complicated situation whereby he is ‘owned’ by investment company MSI to their advantage. If it comes off, it will be one hell of a coup, but I have a sneaky feeling it could backfire on them…

Click through to find out why…


Everton 1-2 Manchester City: Match Reaction

27.04.09
I reckon Jags was feeling even worse than me after Saturdays game.

I reckon Jags was feeling even worse than me after Saturday's game.

After watching Manchester City overcome my beloved but fatigued Everton side yesterday morning and, even worse, seeing Phil Jagielka stretchered out of our season to join Mikel Arteta, Yakubu and Victor Anichebe on the ‘out for the season’ list, I had plotted to write an article about the injustice of it all. Unfortunately I spent all day yesterday travelling back to Wellington and all day today doing Uni work slash being at Uni, and the bitterness that fuelled my intentions has now decayed to a miserable acceptance that we couldn’t go on forever with so many games and such a slim squad (four season ending injuries – FOUR!).

So instead of the inevitable fiery and angry post that would have appeared had I written it yesterday, click through below to see a short summary of my main reactions to Everton’s defeat at Manchester City, and a really amusing football related web-comic that I stumbled across before. It actually made me laugh despite the rather disgusting living conditions to which I am now returned (there are numerous things growing in the kitchen) and the fact that it has been raining for two days straight.

Go on, click on through…


Premiership Predictions

21.03.09

premiership-predictions-topper1

Portsmouth vs. Everton
Last week Portsmouth and Middlesbrough played out a draw that did neither side much good, and they’ll see it as an opportunity missed. Pompey’s game against Everton today should be much tougher, but the Toffees will not be taking their trip lightly as they know that they face a team scrapping for their survival, and that can bring out the best in some teams. Everton’s injury list continues to hamper them with Yobo the latest to squeeze into the treatment room, with Tony Hibbert and Tim Cahill also nursing knocks. Who knows how Moyes will squeeze a side together, but so far this season they have kept producing results and I believe they may repeat the trick again today. It’ll be a battle though.
Prediction: 1-2.

Blackburn Rovers vs. West Ham United
West Ham sit pretty in seventh in the Premier League and can look at Blackburn’s perilous position with smug glee all over their faces: it could so easily have been them. Zola has worked his magic, but this will be a tough trip for the little Italian’s side. They’re starting to pick up some end-of-season niggles as the season catches up with them and they may not fancy it today against a physical Rovers side. Allardyce will have his team fired up for their scrap for survival and home games will be the key. They will want to make the most of a home advantage and will probably outfight the Hammers today.
Prediction: 1-0.

Click through for all of this week’s predictions…


Fair Play: A European Adventure

20.03.09
Man City: taking advantage of UEFA's stupidity.

Man City: taking advantage of UEFA's stupidity.

Man City overcame AaB Aalborg on penalties yesterday after slumping to a 2-0 defeat in the second leg. The club-formerly-known as a yo-yo club and now derided for being the World’s Richest Club came very close to being Eliminated from the UEFA Cup, and indeed any travelling fans must have thought they’d blown it when Evans conceded a late penalty. But it is a wonder they are there at all, when you think about it.

Manchester City were, according to the final Premier League table, the 9th best team in English football last season. The ‘big four’ took the four Champions League places, Everton and Villa finished 5th and 6th respectively, qualifying for the UEFA Cup, and Portsmouth won the FA Cup (and finished 8th) to secure their passage in European competition. Blackburn Rovers, who finished 7th in the Premier League last season, didn’t qualify for the UEFA Cup.

Click through for the full article…


Six Reasons why Luiz Felipe Scolari will manage Manchester City

15.02.09
Will 'Big Phil' be City's next Skipper?

Will 'Big Phil' be City's next Skipper?

Everyone loves a bit of a conspiracy theory, so here’s one for you. After his early exit from Stamford Bridge, I reckon that Big Phil will end up at Manchester City, in an attempt to get revenge on the London club that treated him rather harshly. Credit for this theory must go to my Dad and Brother who suggested it to me the day after he was sacked, I’ve been thinking about it and it sounds very feasible.

Click through to find out why…


In One Quote: Why foreign investors are bad for football.

24.01.09

fahim-quote

It’s a topic that has been much under discussion in recent years, and I myself, in the few short months that I have been writing this blog, have tackled it a couple of times. But the thing is, no matter how often people come to the conclusion that foreign investment in football is a bad thing, clubs will continue to try and sell themselves to a mega rich investor. Clubs know that money will play a huge role in determining their success on the pitch.

It is important to distinguish at this point though, that my title is not absolute and objective in it’s stance. I do believe, and intend to argue, that foreign investment, by which I mean the heavy financial involvement in British clubs of men who have no history in football never mind with that particular club, is a bad thing. However, I will acknowledge that sometimes, foreign investment can be a positive thing for a club, but that this is a worryingly rare occurrence. For instance, I believe that Aston Villa landed on their feet when Randy Lerner bought their club as he has proved a sensible and withdrawn owner, willing to back but not insistent upon ‘making waves’. However, this seems to be very much the minority, with other foreign owners seeming to cause nothing but trouble, as I suggested the other day.

Reading through the BBC’s football news this morning though, I happened across a piece that revealed a supposed attempt to buy Chelsea being lined up by one of the investors from the Abu Dhabi group who have so recently sent shock waves around the football world with their audacious and downright ludicrous bid for Kaka. If true, this story is shocking in two ways: firstly, Chelsea are already probably the second richest club in the world, despite Roman Abromovich’s stock having fallen a little with the economic crisis; but secondly (and mainly) because of a quote that was given by the investor in question at the end of the article:

“You don’t make money because 11 guys run around the pitch, you make money because of all the other commercial aspects that go with a football club, particularly real estate and television rights.” – Dr Sulaiman al-Fahim.

When I read this, it simply confirmed my fears that have been growing steadily for years, as the influx of foreign investment into the British game has increased exponentially. There is something about that quote that just seems innately wrong, completely at odds with our game and the proper attitude that should be held towards it, especially by those who are involved on the inside, those running the game.

Of course, we all know that these investors are so keen to jump on the football bandwagon because it is such a big business. There is lots of money and football, incredible amounts even, and with a sharp business mind, a clever investor can reap massive personal reward from the game. That is OK to an extent. We know that in the end, they’re in it for themselves, but on the whole, an investor will benefit the club he is investing in too. To being about such a gain for himself usually implies some initial financial input which helps the stock of the club rise through good performance and success.

However, Fahim’s comments show that he does not really see it this way. He is clearly only interested in the money side of things, which is only to be expected, but his declaration that you only make money because of all the “commercial aspects” rather than “because 11 guys run around the pitch” are worrying indeed. He seems to be forgetting that were it not for the “11 guys running around the pitch” there would be no “commercial aspects” to speak of in the first place.

This is the really distressing thing about these investors. They see the football, the actual game, the sport, the thing that we watch, the thing we love, the thing that we are so passionate about, as something that merely exists to help them make money. It is to them, merely a background occurrence, a necessity, a cog in their money making machine. Oh yes, they know that it is essential, that without that cog their machine would be useless, but they do not care in which direction the cog is moving. As long as the machine still functions, they could not care less about the football.

Of course, the ironic and most distressing part of the whole diabolical situation is that with this neglect of the football side of things, with their apathy towards the actual game itself, the fortunes of their club on the field are likely to plummet dramatically. This will ultimately and eventually render the club as a whole useless as a money making machine and thus their cogs will cease to turn. But the terrible thing is that by that point, the businessmen invested in the club will have sucked it dry of everything it had anyway. It will have made them a steady amount of money over the years and so when things are drying up they will simply walk away, leaving the club up the proverbial creek.

And then there will be no one left to the club but the fans. Those fans who bankrolled the machine, who kept it going, who stayed loyal to the club despite the owners greedy and money-obsessed antics. The fans who watched their clubs performances falter and dip, who have seen their club fall into financial turmoil. They will still be there, depressed and distraught but as faithful as ever, with a shell of a club, the shadow of its former self.

What these businessmen don’t realise is that the true value of football is not the “commercial aspects” like “real estate” and “television rights”. Yes, these things are big business and involve a lot of cash, but they are not the heart of it. The only reason they exist in the first place is because of the football. There was a time when footballers earned a normal salary. When the players were normal people, and matches on television were a rare occurrence. But we fell in love with the game. It captured our hearts and our imagination, and so it gradually became more and more like the game we know today.

But it was a slow process. And the only reason anyone was interested at all was the football. People loved to watch the game played, so would pay to watch it broadcast live on TV. Even more so, people loved the atmosphere of going to a match, so clubs built big stadiums so that more people could see the games. They liked to see the game played well, so more and more money was shelled out for the services of the best players. That is why there are “commercial aspects”, that is why there are “real estate” assets and “television rights” deals. Without the football, there would be no money.

And without the football, there would be no investors. The problem is that these investors don’t realise that. Fahim doesn’t realise that the football won’t just go on forever in the background. If he ignores it and lets it stagnate, the club will die. If it happens at more clubs, the game as a whole in Britain will start to decay and crumble. The competitiveness will go out of it, and it will become boring and lose its appeal. Fans will drift away, no one will pay to watch it on TV, much less pay exorbitant prices to watch it live. And suddenly, there will be no money in football anymore.

Unfortunately, it seems to me at this point that the game can’t exist without money. It cannot return to the way it was before the Premier League era. It cannot return to normality. If the money went out of the game, it would die altogether now. So these foreign owners will not just slowly kill the clubs they invest in, milking them for all the profit they have and leaving them hollow and defeated. They will eventually kill the game itself, unless they begin to realise that there is more to football than money. The two must coexist now, they have developed a dependence upon one another, but just as football will die if it loses the money, so will their money die if football runs out of steam.

Unless Fahim and others like him then are able to realise the true value of the game, where the real money and value lies, their money-making exploits will eventually be extinct. Unless they realise what we the fans have always know, that football is about “11 guys run[ing] around the pitch” their ventures will fail. But they won’t break sweat. They’ve already got enough money, which is what they care about. But we must hope they realise it, because otherwise, what we care about, our game and our clubs, will end up dead, broken and deflated. Quite literally, football will be robbed of it’s heart.


Big Money = Big Trouble

21.01.09
They were offering how much?! Oh no...

"They were offering how much?! Oh no..."

So Kaka is not going to play for Man City, he won’t be the world’s most expensive player and nor will he earn £26m a year. It is so refreshing to finally someone involved in football who hasn’t just snatched the money being offered without even thinking it through, and Kaka has made the decision that makes sense – because really, Man City are fighting relegation and AC Milan are one of the best teams in the world. Who would you rather play for (especially considering he has a more than healthy salary already)?

However, although we have finally found someone with the moral fibre to make an admirable decision in the face of incredible wealth, the whole episode does go a long way to illuminate just how much of a disruption money can be to football. I cannot, and would not even want to, deny the positive impact that money has had on the game since the inception of the Premier League and Sky TV’s enormous contribution, but more and more these days we are witnessing moments of excess that threaten to ruin football for the punters, the men (and women) on the street.

The incident with Kaka really gave us two sides of the coin. On one hand we have Kaka, who turned down an incredible amount of money for the good of his career and indeed his happiness. On the other, you have Robinho, whose decision to join City in the Summer now looks entirely unfavourable given Kaka’s rejection of the club. It seems clear now that Robinho went there just for the money and on the promise that more would be spent to ensure that he wouldn’t be the only superstar for long. Indeed, it is this promise that has really shown us just how much disharmony can be created by over-zealous investors, as Robinho seems to have gone AWOL upon hearing he wouldn’t be having Kaka as a fellow Citizen.

Though the little Brazilian claims to have ‘stormed out’ of City’s training camp in Tenerife for ‘family reasons’, I think the reaction of the City executive Garry Cook was more revealing as to the truth of the situation as he admitted he did not know why Robinho was absent but confirmed that he had indeed disappeared. If, as the player claims, he left for family reasons, he would surely have enlightened someone as to his reasons for departing, however quickly he wanted to return home. Instead it seems to me that what actually happened, namely his leaving unannounced with no explanation, is far more indicative of a player unhappy with the unfulfillment of promises made and beginning to regret committing himself to the club.

All in all then, the whole Kaka ‘situation’, which could now more accurately be described as a ‘fiasco’, simply adds another layer of misery to a season that had promised so much but so far has been rather spectacular only in it’s underwhelming disappointment. The club was filled with a surge of optimism upon learning that they were now the richest club in the world, but since that announcement, things have gone rapidly downhill, and I must say, I believe that is no coincidence.

For a start, the mere arrival of Robinho in such a gala of publicity and showbiz can only have had a negative effect on the rest of City’s squad, a fact that hindsight seems only to resoundingly confirm. While the players all came out in support of the move in public, one cannot help but wonder what must have been going through their heads. The new owners had been in place only hours when the capture of a superstar for £32m was announced, and the existing players, hardworking lads like Stephen Ireland, Richard Dunne and Michael Johnson, must have wondered what they would be able to achieve in a month come the January transfer window.

It is therefore little surprise that City have had such an inconsistent season. At times they have produced some great results and some good performances, but at others they have simply failed to turn up, and thus find themselves at quite the wrong end of the table. This sort of inconsistency, given the proven quality of the players at Hughes’ disposal, can only suggest that mentally, the players are not in the right frame of mind, and this surely comes down to a fear of what may lie in store in the future, what their long term prospects at the club are, be it on a subconscious level or otherwise, it must surely be on their minds.

It can be reasonably concluded then, that the arrival on the scene of the Abu Dhabi group at Manchester City has overall, had a negative effect on the club. After all, last season they had quite a successful season, and at one point looked like providing a challenge to the top four. Their season dropped off towards the end, but with some consolidation and some strength in depth they could surely have been looking forward to a realistic challenge this time. Instead they find themselves almost universally disliked and humiliated as the richest club in the world that has just bungled the most high profile transfer-that-wasn’t in recent memory and near the foot of the Premier League table.

One has to feel sorry then, for the fans. As usual, they are the only real losers in all of this. After all, the owners are still insanely wealthy, the players are still earning a good salary and the clubs executives have other transfers to busy themselves with. But what really matters to the fans, which is the clubs performances and thus league position, is what has taken a severe blow. They could have been reasonably looking forward to a successful year (relatively speaking), but now find themselves swamped in the all too familiar mire of a relegation battle.

It also seems particularly harsh that the fans that should suffer this humiliation are Man City’s. In their recent history they have been some of the most long suffering in the Football League, and yet even when they sunk to their lowest point (a season in the old Division Two, now known as League One) they were still drawing crowds of an admirable size – indeed crowds that were bigger than some crowds that certain Premier League clubs can attract even today. Such loyalty should not be rewarded with such poor and fickle running of the club. These fans deserve to have something to shout about, they’ve surely earned it.

Indeed, they probably thought that they had found something to shout about too, which makes it all the more cruel. After all, when Chelsea inherited some mega-bucks, they garnered almost instant reward for it, and City’s fans may have expected a similar pay-off. However, Claudio Ranieri didn’t go out and instantly pay silly money for superstar names, he built a really good, solid, balanced side, and ultimately paid the price. He took too long to gain major silverware and so was replaced, but it was is work that laid the foundation for Mourinho’s success. The trouble is, everyone expects Money to produce instantaneous success now, because they forget what Ranieri did for Chelsea.

Hopefully though, City’s stuttering season along with the fresh debacle over Kaka’s transfer and now Robinho’s apparent hissy fit will finally hammer home the message that money isn’t the be all and end all. It was said when City were first bought out that it would be a gradual climb towards the top, but few really listened, least of all the owners. In splashing such money on Robinho they attempted to run before they could work and have rightly found themselves crashed to the ground and covered with bruises.

Let this be a lesson then, to all those clubs who are desperately hoping for a foreign investor of their own. Man City’s wealth has brought them the opposite of success, a point reinforced by Kaka’s unwillingness to play for them, despite the ludicrous riches dangled under his nose. This is, if anything, the surest sign that a club needs more than money. They need stability first of all, because only with stability and balance can there be success. Even a relative amount of success, or even just progress. But the club must be going in the right direction before such audacious signings can be made.

Of course there are exceptions. Robinho was an audacious signing, but I think he has shown himself to be quite a greedy person in signing for City in the first place. I’m sure he was promised success, but he should have understood that it couldn’t happen overnight, and in the end the telling factor had to have been the money. I doubt that he will stick around much longer either, but for City’s fans, that is surely good news. Such loyal and passionate fans, that followed their club to Division Two and back again, surely do not, in their heart of hearts, want someone like Robinho playing for them.

Players of his quality yes, but not of his mentality. He does not want to play for the club. He plays for the money. He does not have the clubs best interests at heart and when the going gets tough that will become blindingly apparent, as indeed it has over the last few days. This whole episode has shown the fickleness of money within the game. It promises so much that it cannot deliver single-handedly, and it brings players to the club under false pretences, giving the fans hope before dashing it spectacularly.

Football fans are not fickle people, at least proper fans aren’t anyway. I expect City have gained some fickle ones since they inherited their wealth but they will soon sneak away and dig out their Chelsea shirts again if City keep going as they are. But on the whole, you will be hard pressed to find people more committed to a cause that doesn’t directly benefit them in any way. We fans pour unreasonable amount of money and of our selves into our clubs expecting little in return. What we don’t expect though, and what we don’t deserve, is to be treated as mere disposable income by our clubs.

Our clubs should appreciate the sheer amount that we give to them, but in today’s financially obsessed climate, our financial input is dwarfed and our devoted contribution of support and love is simply ignored and misguidedly dismissed as important. City must realise the value of their fans, and realise that for the club to succeed they must make them happy. That is something money alone can’t do, they have to provide the fans with a club that they can be proud of, players that they can relate to, and a reasonable amount of progress on the pitch.

I hope then, that the Kaka incident will make an impact on the world of football. If only that it means that we admire Kaka greatly for his commitment to Milan’s cause and his self control in turning his back on the sort of money that would make me faint. Hopefully though it will do more than that. Hopefully Kaka’s realisation that there is more to football than money will rub off on clubs, players and fans around the world. Kaka should be admired, and Robinho should be mistrusted, as should the owners who waltz into clubs with their massive chequebooks and upset the balance of everything that the fans adore.

In the end, football will eventually learn that money, like many things, is relative to trouble. Big money means big trouble, and I just hope that more clubs don’t have to learn the hard way, if only for the sake of their fans.